Blogads

Google Ads


« Father-Son Rivalry: Mets-Yanks Gamer VI | Main | Shea Hey! (Reprise) »

Monday, June 18, 2007

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Is this serious?

Probably won't help him stay though. Ah well.

Nick, you're better than this. A-Rod is having this year because he's the greatest player in the history of the game, and if I had to guess, he's at ease with his situation because he knows that the ball is in his court.

Probably won't help him stay though. Ah well.

No, the new huge contract will do that. And it will be worth every single penny.

I pictured the pivotal moment more like Good Will Hunting: Jeter holding A-Rod and repeating "it's not your fault, it's not your fault" over and over again. *sniffle*

So Derek Jeter should be the MVP of this young season then.

It could clearly be argued that shortcomings in Jeter's "captaining" of the team is one of the key difference in why the Yanks haven't brought home any world series rings of late. When Pauly was captain, many have said he was the clubhouse leader that Torre isn't. He was the guy who gave the pep talks and he was the guy who helped players through cold spells. Say what you want about Jeter as a great player but I don't think he can fill Pauly's shoes in the clubhouse. Hopefully, he is learning and growing through this experience.

Paul O'Neill (is that who we're talking about here?) was not a Yankee captain. I'm not sure anyone looked at O'Neill as a captain. Tino, maybe. Non starter.

Bard, please look at the tag.

or Brad as he is better known!

Brad - The greatest player in the history of the game? Really? Honestly? He's not even the greatest player on his own team.

He is having what is known as a career year. Every great player has one. Hell, even some not so good players have them (see Anderson, Brady).

I'd say you're half right, JP. A-Rod's certainly the greatest hitter on his own team. Were he on the Red Sox, he'd be the second-greatest hitter on that team (Ramirez, Manny). Not sure about "greatest player in the history of the game." I'd lean toward Williams, myself, but I'd freely admit some bias there.

Nick was just having some laughs, but the underlying point -- that Jeter was unfairly blamed last year for A-Rod's struggles -- misses the arguments made last season. Jeter wasn't the cause for A-Rod's struggles, but he certainly could have made life easier for him by speaking up for him with the fans like he did Giambi. Not sure if Jeter could have explained the difference between "performing and performing under pressure." Klapisch might instead have been showing the difference between writing cogently and writing under deadline. :-)

ARod is a great hitter, no doubt. I just don't know why I'm not scared when he's up with the game on the line (the HR off a poor pitch Paps threw 0-2 notwithstanding). When Jeter is up in a clutch spot, I'm terrified.

It wasn't really a poor pitch unless you think ever throwing a strike on 0-2 is a bad idea (which I sort of understand, but I think it's okay to vary it a little...). It was in the lowest-awayest part of the strike zone. A-Rod reached for it, smacked it.

I think the clutch thing is silly (A-Rod's had 2 come-from-behind walkoff homers at least this year, and that homer off Papelbon), but I will admit I am a little more afraid if there are runners in scoring position and it's Jeter at the plate. However, I'm more afraid if it's a 1-run lead or tie game and A-Rod's at the plate.

However once more...that can pretty much be attributed to Jeter's higher batting average, and A-Rod's greater power threat.

Actually, after the game Paps admitted he missed his spot with that pitch. When you have someone as locked in as ARod 0-2, you really cannot make the mistake of throwing a fastball away to him that catches 1/3 of the plate. He should have either went split down and away or slider away there. He didn't and it cost him.

And you're right, this year he has been way better with the game on the line than in years past. I'm still more worried when Jeter's up though.

Yeesh. Right now, no, he's not one of the greatest all-time. (He is, however, without a doubt, at this moment, the most dangerous hitter in the game). He's only 32, for cripes sake. But when all is said and done, people are projecting him to be among the 5 greatest players of all time, which, going by his pace, is not ridiculous at all.

He's having a career year. But a career year for a great player is a historic year. When you're on pace for 67 HR and 181 RBI (best all-time for a non-juiced player), well, it's hard for your year to be anything but.

Truth is, he was a great player, he is a great player, and he will be a great player for many years to come. Manny is probably the greatest right-handed hitter of our generation, but with a few more years under his belt, Alex Rodriguez might just take on that mantle.

Alex Rodriguez will be the youngest player ever, by nearly a full year, to hit his 500th homerun (Jimmie Fox was 32 years and 366 days old). Try to tell me that does not impress you a little bit.

Please note that when I say "best all-time", I'm just going by homeruns. No doubt Teddy Ballgame's .411 (or so) year is something that will never be repeated, and is by definition 'best'.

Not to pick nits, Andrew, as I agree with you entirely, but Hack Wilson wasn't juiced when he got his 190 RBI (or is it 191 or 189 now? I forget.)... Well he mighta been "juiced," but not with steroids...

And even in the juiced era, people don't usually get much higher than 160 RBI's, so anytime anybody gets up there, it's a damn good season.

Of course, it needs *a lot* of things to go right for that to happen, since you don't fully control your destiny, per se, but in this lineup, you can't help but give it good odds (or at least, as good as you can give it for these rare events..)

"Jimmie Fox was 32 years and 366 days old"

How does that work? Even in a leap year the oldest he could be without turning 33 is 32 years and 365 days.

"Of course, it needs *a lot* of things to go right for that to happen, since you don't fully control your destiny, per se, but in this lineup..."

Which is why RBI is not a good stat to look at.

Without getting into the real sabermetric stuff, I'd just like to point out that A-Rod's OPS+ (on-base + slugging adjusted to league average) is an ungodly 195. His previous career high in that category was 167 (twice, most recently in 2005). That's just nuts.

Right now, no, he's not one of the greatest all-time.

Not to disagree with Andrew in particular, but I sincerely think that A-Rod is already one of the greatest players of all time. Forgetting career longevity as a parameter, he's already established himself as superior, skillwise, to at least 99% of the players who have come before him on offense (at the plate AND on the basepaths), and before he moved to third he was a very good fielding shortstop, absolutely fearsome from that position when you factored in what he brought at the plate. Not much can convince me that A-Rod isn't one of the best ever, even at 32.

195 is insane, considering most of the highest OPS+ years consist of Bonds and Babe (and to a lesser extent, Ted) gets so many intentional walks to boost that OBP..

I wonder when ARod will get that treatment..

"I forgive you." The Captain turned to A-Rod and the two embraced.

Then, the two Yankee icons engaged in a long, slow passionate kiss.

Romantic music swells on the soundtrack, as we

FADE to BLACK.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Search YFSF




Sports Gambling

twitter

schedule & standings