The curtain has been pulled back a little further and Dan Duquette starts shoveling. Thank you, Lou. One question: who are MLB's Jay Bybee, Stephen Bradbury, and John Yoo? There's gotta be a memo somewhere.


Check out these tickets: Red Sox Yankees tickets, all MLB tickets, Preakness Stakes tickets, Kentucky Derby tickets and Wimbledon tennis tickets.
See popular online slots at Slots Entertainment, est. 2003.
YFSF is in the NYC Blogads Network. Reach readers of 21 New York indie blogs with one click.
« More on Manny | Main | Take a Hike »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Baseball betting handicappers refer all sports betting fans to the best sportsbook in the industry: SBGGlobal.com
I wouldn't put it past Selig for being that dumb, but the more I think about it the more this seems like a case of federalism where teams acted out of their own interests. So I expect that some teams will have stories like Merloni's while other teams will have been more oblivious.
Of course, the Bybee memo was open to Freedom of Information requests, where I don't see any team or MLB memo being open to the same scrutiny. Still, all it takes is one high-level whistle blower with an axe to grind - maybe, eventually, Duquette himself.
Posted by: Rob | Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 09:52 AM
I find it hard to disbelieve anything Merloni said after listening to that audio.
Posted by: attackgerbil | Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 02:24 PM
And don't forget this story.
Posted by: attackgerbil | Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 02:25 PM
Gerb, a slightly different spin to the story, which indicates the doctor was hired by the Player's Association.
Posted by: SF | Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 02:41 PM
> indicates the doctor was hired by the Player's Association
You are correct and I should have made that clear when posting the link. I was trying to illustrate an example of an outlier (well, in this case a pariah) who made claims of tacit institutional acknowledgment of steroid use that were dismissed/met with muted reaction at the time due to potential motive and source.
Posted by: attackgerbil | Tuesday, May 12, 2009 at 03:04 PM